What is the opposite of negotiation?

The choice of manipulation as the opposite of negotiation is rooted in the fundamental nature of these terms. Negotiation typically involves a process where two or more parties communicate and work together to reach a mutually beneficial agreement or compromise. This implies a level of openness, respect for each party’s interests, and the intention to find a solution that satisfies both sides.

Manipulation, on the other hand, connotes a more deceptive approach, where one party may use underhanded tactics to influence or control the other. This creates a significant departure from the principles of negotiation, which relies on voluntary and transparent dialogue. While negotiation seeks to build consensus and trust, manipulation often erodes these values, as it prioritizes one party's agenda over that of the collective negotiation process.

The other options reflect cooperative strategies aimed at problem-solving or reaching an understanding, which are integral to negotiation rather than in opposition to it. Compromise and collaboration suggest working together to find solutions, while agreement implies a conclusion reached through negotiation rather than a process opposed to it. Thus, manipulation clearly stands out as a contrasting approach to negotiation.